At the outset, I should acknowledge two things that surprised, and irritated me throughout this meeting: first, the Community Room at the Mattapan Branch Library functioned (for the first time, to my knowledge) as intended (respond if you'd like me to say more about this); second, the ratio of bureaucrats to community residents seemed skewed to me.
Even though there was 'standing-room' only, that is, by the time MBTA's General Manager, Dr. Beverly Scott rose to frame the issue, 'the die was [already] cast,' so to speak.
Dr. Scott spoke eloquently (I thought) about the need: 50% of Mattapan residents depend on public transit systems; it takes, at minimum, 45 minutes-- including transfers and wait times, to get from Mattapan Square to downtown Boston; so providing access to the commuter rail is critical so Mattapan residents can have greater access to economic opportunities.
Fairmount Corridor Improvements Project
In sum, then, a "one seat ride to downtown Boston," a direct "[c]onnection to other neighborhoods along the Fairmount Corridor" coupled with a new (reduced) Zone 1A fare structure would bring ridership in line with access to the commuter rail via the proposed Blue Hill Ave Station. (Public Meeting, MassDot/MBTA handout, 9.15.2014)
This then set the stage for presentations by the Blue Hill Ave. Station Project Team; most notably, Jacobs Engineering's Mark Thompson. He explained why,
after considering alternative sites for the proposed station, the Project Team settled on situating it at Blue Hill Ave. Mr. Thompson also described how the Team had come up with a redesign to accommodate abutters' concerns about construction:
A few members of the audience expressed relief that the proposed station redesign kept access for the 'differently-abled' in mind. While others took a more dismissive tact, complaining that access is meaningless if it's blocked when snow isn't removed.
Wrapping up his presentation, Mr. Thompson noted the following: